← Back to systems
01Flagship caseCurrent

Clinical Knowledge Wiki

Reviewed, versioned knowledge built from traceable evidence.

A knowledge production platform that organizes clinical knowledge around sources, evidence, professional review, and version management.

Project roles

Product Owner · Statistician · Systems Architect · Primary Builder

01 / The work problem

Statistical decisions become difficult to defend when source material, extracted facts, interpretation, and approval are mixed together or lose their lineage.

02 / Workflow change

Sources are organized and linked to evidence before becoming reviewable knowledge entries; author confirmation, independent review, and version publication form one continuous knowledge-production flow.

03 / From input to review

Inputs, execution, validation, and review remain traceable.

  1. 01

    Register a source and record its document version

  2. 02

    Locate evidence and preserve its original context

  3. 03

    Organize evidence into a reviewable knowledge entry

  4. 04

    Complete author confirmation and independent review

  5. 05

    Publish a knowledge version with sources and applicability

04A / Professional judgment

Authors and independent reviewers determine applicability, resolve conflicts, finalize knowledge, and approve published versions.

04B / System support

The system supports document organization, evidence location, relation-based retrieval, consistency checks, and review preparation while preserving source and version context.

05 / Verified evidence

Current capabilities verified against project sources.

  1. 01

    The current foundation includes structured sources, evidence, knowledge entries, versions, relations, and review records.

    Source · clinical-workflow · PROJECT_SPEC.md
  2. 02

    Document processing supports content organization, coordinated parallel work, evidence location, and traceable records.

    Source · clinical-workflow · PROJECT_SPEC.md
  3. 03

    Evidence can be organized into reviewable knowledge entries for evaluation and version management.

    Source · clinical-workflow · PROJECT_SPEC.md
  4. 04

    The Chinese knowledge-governance interface covers sign-in, role-based collaboration, knowledge review, and status visibility.

    Source · clinical-workflow · PROJECT_SPEC.md

06 / Project status

Implemented capabilities and planned extensions.

Current

  • Source registration, document processing, evidence location, knowledge entries, and the governance interface

Exploring

  • Knowledge organization, quality evaluation, general version management, and complete review records

Long-term

  • Reviewed, traceable knowledge versions supplied to the clinical workflow

07 / Workflow foundation

  • Source and version management
  • Evidence location and relation-based retrieval
  • Professional review and quality evaluation
  • Traceable knowledge publication

Workflow context

View complete workflow →

Related insights